TruhkPouch Front Packing STP Boxer Underwear - FTM Transgender (XS) Light Gray

True to size. Very comfortable. Fits packer well and for the most part it stays in place. Would recommend.

They feel thin and nice and comfortable. I dont know what other ppl are complaining about, they seem perfectly awesome to me.

Note: I have a Gen3 STP Pack-n-play from Peecock, measuring 3.5 in, until I can save for one from Emersil.Likes: comfortable, and stylish color.Dislikes: the hole is too high for a proper fit; my STP sits way too high for me to use it for that purpose and would also likely not be able to withstand the demands of "play" either, so they are only good for general packing. There is an inner flap that impinges the fit of the STP. The waistband is not supportive enough for the weight of an STP, probably not even a regular packer either. The material is thin and cheap and is the sort of weave that will start to "pill" easily. For $30 there are better products.Recommendation: try the RodeoH harness underwear. Super comfortable, quality build, and the hole is in the right place, plus it's reinforced with an o-ring. Some models even come with two holes!

Bad for packing especially with an STP. Material is too stretchy and thin to securely hold it in place. I guess if you're just, like, shoving a sock in there that's fine but at that point why are you paying more for something with an o-ring and external access when there are simpler closed pocket ones?Material also feels thinner than the normal RodeoH boxer briefs... Weird. Just very weird all around.

While briefs are comfortable and stretchy, they aren’t suited for packing as they’re either too stretchy or packer pocket is too large. The packer flops around like a wet fish whenever doing anything. And I felt it bounce against my legs just walking. Secondly, the waistband is too thin and without ironing, will stay crumpled up and never flatten the same again.

The media could not be loaded.  stretchy, soft, tastes great