The Labyrinth of Solitude: The Other Mexico, Return to the Labyrinth of Solitude, Mexico and the United States, the Philanthropic Ogre (Winner of the Nobel Prize)

''The captive Elements and the ancientLaws of the Earth break looseLike maddened horses. And then a desire to returnTo chaos rises incessantly. There is muchTo defend, and the faithful are much needed.''- Hölderlin (26)Laws need 'faithful defenders'. Chaos does not.''The faithful are much needed because there is ''much to defend''. . . . But exile, expiation and penitence should proceed from the reconciliation of man with the Universe. Neither the Mexican nor the North American has achieved this reconciliation.'' (26)Paz is here expressing religio/philosophical ideas. These are not ecomonic/political concerns. Takes some adjusting.Great!''What is even more serious, I am afraid we have lost our sense of the very meaning of all human activity, which is to assure the operation of an order in which knowledge and innocence, man and nature are in harmony. If the solitude of the Mexican is like a stagnant pool, that of the North American is like a mirror.'' (27)Mirror only reflects what is already there. Can't give anything more.Paz consistently provides comparison; Mexican/American, etc.,etc.. Effective teaching method.''We have ceased to be springs of living water.'' (27)(Probably Biblical reference to Jeremiah's warning to apostate Jews . . .‘Because my people have done two bad things:They have abandoned me,the source of living water,And dug for themselves cisterns,Broken cisterns, that cannot hold water.’)Paz received Nobel prize for this work. Comes from deep within his soul. Heartfelt, insightful, torn from anguish and love.Astounding!Chapters -The Pachuco and other extremesMexican MasksThe Day of the DeadThe Sons of La MalincheThe conquest and ColonialismFrom independence to the revolutionThe Mexican IntelligentsiaThe present dayThe Dialectic of SolitudePaz starts with a psychological/philosophical explanation of the Mexican mind. For example . . .''Past epochs never vanish completely, and blood drips from all their wounds, even the most ancient. Sometimes the most remote or hostile beliefs and feelings are found together in one city or one soul, or are superimposed like those pre-Cortesian pyramids that always conceal others.'' (12)Paz then adds a fascinating footnote . . .''In our history there are many examples of this superimposition: the neofeudalism of the Porfirio Díaz regime, using positivism to justify itself historicaly; Antonio Caso and José Vasconcelos, the intellectual initiators of the revolution, using the ideas of Boutroux and Bergson to combat positivism; socialist education in a country at least incipiently capitalist. These apparent contradictions all demand a new examination of our history and also our culture.'' (12)Think of the breadth of reading and depth of insight revealed in this paragraph!This work includes the essay - ''Mexico and the United States''. . .''In 1917 the October revolution in Russia kindled the hopes of millions' in 1979, the word ''gulag'' has become synonymous with Soviet socialism. The founders of the socialist movement firmly believed would put an end not only to the exploitation of men but to war' in the second half of the twentieth century, totalitarian ''socialism'' have enslaved the working class by stripping it of its basic rights. . . . The ideological wars of the twentieth century are no less ferocious than the wars of religion of the seventeenth century.'' (374)Many scholars have now made the same connection.''When I was young, the idea that we were witnessing the final crisis of capitalism was fashionable among intellectuals. Now we understand that the crisis is not of a socioeconomic system but that of our whole civilization.'' (374)‘Crisis of civilization’! Who can doubt it?''The sickness of the west is moral rather than social and economic. . . . But the real, most profound discord lies in the soul. The future has become the realm of horror, and the present has turned into a desert.'' (374)‘Moral sickness’! Why?''The empty place left by Christianity in the modern soul is filled not by philosophy but by the crudest superstitions.'' (375)What ‘crude superstitions’? Well . . . nationalism, racism, materialism, scientism; i.e. - ‘worship of abstract nouns’.This edition has no bibliography or index.(See also, ''Portrait of Mexico'', by Diego Rivera/Bertram Wolfe; ''The Revolt of the Masses'' by Jóse Ortega y Gasset. Fascinating!)

I cannot praise this book enough, though I realize there must be other interpretations of Mexico. Octavio Paz, Nobel Prize-winner, perceives an Aztec archetype operating behind the changing masks of power in Mexico, be they Hernan Cortez, Porfirio Diaz, or the current el presidente. The Mexicans are not exactly Hispanic, nor are they Latino. Instead the population is a mixture of pure-blooded Spaniards, mixed Indian and Spaniard (Mestizos), and indigenous ("Indians" so-called). The latter have for centuries adapted themselves to various rulers by blending into the scenery - as Paz puts it about transplanted Mexicanos, they are both here and not here, simultaneously. It is not so much therefore that they are "living in the shadows" as that this has become over the centuries their traditional way of adapting. Written with the keen insight of a poet, Paz's book will give you a "crash course" on what is Mexico.

Octavio Paz's insights and engaging narrative are superb. If you want to understand Mexican cultural identity as juxtaposed to that of the USA, this is essential reading, and there is nothing else like it. Like any important work, I found there were numerous points of agreement and disagreement as I read; this kind of book is meant to challenge preconceptions and cause the reader to think.I am less enthusiastic about Lysander Kemp's translation, which seems stilted at times and gets in the way of understanding as much as it helps. It feels almost transliterative, with long, run-on sentences and multiple levels of subordinate clauses. It may be faithful to the original Spanish construction, but is somewhat hard to digest in English. A less-literal, more idea-based approach would be helpful - or read it in the original, if you can.

conseguí. Aquí lo pude conseguir, llego excelente 👌

This book is priceless. It is about Mexican history in the context of American Continents and the world. It is a book of analysis of how Mexico emerged as the country it is today (or 1970 as that was the time the book was completed, by adding new chapters to previous ones written even before that) and its place in the world and its relationship with US. It is not a book for the masses, but once started it flows. I found it easy to read because Octavio Paz presents ideas in a very clear manner.Like Alexander Solzhenitzin, Octavio Paz writes books for the ages, explaining history and social issues in a very direct, open, critical way. I am not Mexican. This book is a must read by anybody who wants to understand the "whys" of our times.

I don’t know why it took me so many years to read this beautiful, wise book.

This is my second reading of this classic Mexican look at Mexicans (and some Mexican Americans) of the 60's. I just wonder how Dr. Paz would respond to the current political and social climate toward Mexicans and Mexican Americans in America. What Dr. Paz does is remind us that we are all human and that our similarities far outweigh our differences. He also reminds us to not judge the many (or the group) based on the behavior of the few. When I hear people criticize Americans, I remind them of that. The number (percentage) of honorable and respectable Americans far exceeds the few deplorable ones.

Octavio Paz pulls no punches in a self examination of his country's psyche and culture. We are expats residing in Mexico and know there are things here that easily perturb and frustrate foreigners, and I bet to their own also. But, when a Mexican gets that way he shrugs his shoulders,"it's life" as they know it. Foreigners on the other hand will complain and moan. We will shake our heads in dismay, highly critical the way they do things here. But, a study of Paz's book can be quite revelatory, helping the resident alien or tourist to understand this culture's mental make up.....why things are the way they are.

Un gran libro y para extranjeros conocer a Mexico es de gran utilidad

I am still reading it. Sad to see how masquerade they lived their life, and how little value they hold for the role of a woman. A tremendous complex of inferiority in the handling of relationships. A very critical depiction of the Mexican culture

I've always wanted to read about my own culture, and having moved overseas I've wanted to return to some Mexicanese of some sorts, and this has definitely allowed me to reflect on the culture I was born into and at the same time question a lot of my current beliefs.

Work of art

Working my way rather slowly, but pleasantly, through stimulating (and sometimes difficult) Spanish.