The Penguin Book of Ghost Stories: From Elizabeth Gaskell to Ambrose Bierce (Penguin Classics)

Beautiful little book, read to 10 year old and I was surprised she was enjoying, listening, following along lolBook might be a bit dry by modern standards but is rich and atmospheric none the less, glad to have this book on my shelf

good stories

"The Penguin Book of Ghost Stories" is an anthology of 19 oft-collected ghost stories--Michael Newton's selection of what he considers to be the cream of the crop from Elizabeth Gaskell's "The Old Nurse's Story" (1852) and Sheridan Le Fanu's "Green Tea" (1869) through Edith Wharton's "Afterward" (1910).The stories in this book are already in print in several anthologies, most notably "The Oxford Book of English Ghost Stories (Oxford Books of Prose & Verse)" (1986), the twenty-volume Fontana books of 'Great Ghost Stories,' and the classic "Great Tales of Terror and the Supernatural (Modern Library)" (1944). I would rank any of these anthologies over this Penguin starter collection.The editor, Michael Newton says in his 'Note on the Texts' that this collection "aims more at the person who will buy only one such book [of ghost stories] for private reading or for study, and for those who want one volume that brings together the very best examples of the genre."I think he succeeds, for the most part in his choice of stories. The only one I had never read before was Lafcadio Hearn's "Nightmare-Touch" which reads more like a dream diary than a short story. I'm not certain I would have included so many stories told in dialect, most especially Robert Louis Stevenson's "Thrawn Janet" (1887), but there are extensive notes at book's end, plus a "Glossary of Scots Words." "What Was It?" by Fitz-James O'Brien is not a ghost story, so strictly speaking, it probably should have been excluded from this collection.Be sure to read Mr. Newton's "Introduction" to this anthology in which he analyzes the purpose of the ghost story, and gives us a brief history of the genre.The stories in this collection: "The Old Nurse's Story" by Elizabeth Gaskell; "What Was It?" by Fitz-James O'Brien; "The Haunted and the Haunters: or, The House and the Brain" by Edward Bulwer Lytton; "The Cold Embrace" by Mary Elizabeth Braddon; "The North Mail" by Amelia B. Edwards; "No. 1 Branch Line: The Signal-man" by Charles Dickens; "Green Tea" by Sheridan Le Fanu; "The Ghost in the Cap'n Brown House" by Harriet Beecher Stowe; "Thrawn Janet" by Robert Louis Stevenson; "The Open Door" by Margaret Oliphant; "At the End of the Passage" by Rudyard Kipling; "Nightmare-Touch" by Lafcadio Hearn; "The Monkey's Paw" by W.W. Jacobs; "The Wind in the Rose-Bush" by Mary Wilkins Freeman; "'Oh, Whistle, and I'll Come to You, My Lad'" by M.R. James; "The Moonlit Road" by Ambrose Bierce; "The Jolly Corner" by Henry James; "The Readjustment" by Mary Austin; "Afterward" by Edith Wharton.

Although the authors of these short stories are well known, these are lesser known short stories by them and that's for a reason--they aren't their best work. I might also mention that to the best of my knowledge all of these works are in the public domain; therefore, you might get them in a collection of works form one of the public domain sites. All in all though, if you already have an extensive library of authors of short stories but are missing some of their lesser known works and want to round out your collection more completely, then you would enjoy this book. If you are new to collecting the masters then you would do better to start elsewhere.

great for my collection

Penguin books are great.

excellent

This newest collection of great ghost stories sticks pretty closely to the title as advertised: an actual ghost is present within most the stories which refuse to haunt other avenues of the supernatural. The editor's intention is admirable and clearly stated early on: "I felt it best not to shy away from some obvious choices. In my view, some very good anthologies of ghost stories are weakened by a desire to pick surprising, neglected or substandard stories by the best writers in the genre, or second rank stories by largely forgotten writers. As a result, the editors produce anthologies for people who collect such anthologies and who already own the classic tales. While this book aims to provide something for such readers, it aims more at the person who will buy only one such book for private reading or study, and for those who want one volume that brings together the very best examples of the genre". He also mentions authors he couldn't get for copyright reasons: Blackwood, Machen, de la Mare, Hitchens, Onions.He addresses what I perceived to be a fault with the new Library of America anthology by Peter Straub: too many second tier stories by famous authors. And while his own anthology corrects this fault to a degree, it lapses into other errors. Some of the most famous stories are not always the author's best or there are other works that ought be equally famous and are much less anthologized (though hardly unknown): I would take MR James "Casting the Runes" before yet another inclusion of the overly available and disappointing "Oh, Whistle". As "The Monkey's Paw" is probably the best ghost story ever written both in its economy of story and proper eeriness, I have no problem with its ghostly presence. But Fitz-James O'Brien's "What Was It?" is not very frightening and Henry James' "The Jolly Corner" is well written and famous but a ghost story in name only. So if I would complain it would be of overall taste, a hard thing to defend or even define.Newton writes a very admirable introduction to the whole topic of ghost stories and gives readers many directions for further reading. But if I were to choose a single anthology that does what Newton aimed to do, I would choose Great Tales of Terror and the Supernatural (Modern Library) or the Dark Descent anthologies. Both are unsurpassed in picking the best written, scariest stories and are still in print. But yet another anthology that seriously aims for quality and frequently achieves it should not be shunned either, like an old dark house in a deserted part of town.

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Um livro com histórias interessantes mas nao muito assustadoras

This collection was for me very much like the curate's egg, good in parts. Many of the stories I was already familiar with from previous anthologies or my wider reading.

A solid collection, rather than brilliant, probably best suited to readers relatively new to the genre.While there's a mix of canonical classics from the likes of Dickens, Le Fanu, M.R. James and Wharton, there are also some lesser-known tales - but overall I'd say that there isn't much variety either in time period or content. Almost all of the stories are nineteenth century and thus feature the well-worn tropes of revenant lovers and enemies, haunted coaches and trains, as well as the classic house.The one story that really stands out is Henry James' The Jolly Corner which uses the skeleton structure of the conventional ghost story to articulate issues of doubleness, identity and the concept of the unlived life - the doppelganger is used to creepy effect and casts a sophisticated eye back on a tradition while moving it decidedly into the 'psychological' twentieth century. I see, though, from other reviews that it's precisely this story which some readers disliked!I can't say that any of these gave me the shivers (and, for the record, I scare easily...). So this is worth reading especially as it's good to have something to dip in and out of, but I've found other anthologies e.g. The Virago Book of Victorian Ghost Stories and The Virago Book of Ghost Stories: The Twentieth Century more innovative and, yes, scary.

This arrived within three days in good used condition as described.