The Case Against the West Memphis 3 Killers: Condensed and revised from "Blood on Black" and "Where the Monsters Go" Paperback – April 15, 2018

Great book on the child killers known as the West Memphis3. The3 little boys need justice for there murders that I'm afraid will never come. This book is full of facts that wm3 supporters either don't know about or refuse to believe. Was a good read but left me feeling sad.

This is a detailed account of the murders at Robin Hood Hills that was made famous in the HBO Paradise Lost series. Meece's account is an absorbing, fact heavy look at the case. His portrait of the lesser known players gives the reader a local resident's view of the case.An invaluable resource and read for all those interested in truth not myth.The WM3's supporters who believe the false narrative of the Paradise Lost documentary series will not like this book. The will attack the book not because it's factually wrong but because it's factually accurate.

There is a lot in here that I haven’t heard of involving this case. It really makes me consider that these three may actually be guilty. At the very least I now want to research more of what I haven’t been told by the movies and documentaries on the west Memphis three.

They may be guilty but you can't tell from this disorganized and dragged out collection of spelling errors.

This book may seem biased against the WM3 because it is. The facts present a rock solid against Echols and crew. The boys were guilty and this book bolsters that. Well written and easy to read. Facts only.

I appreciate the author's attempt to catalog evidence against the popular grain; the writing itself is confusing often and needed some serious editing. I finished it because I've been invested in this case and this content for twenty years, but it was a slog. At the end of the day, I'm still going to trust a professional FBI profiler like John Douglas who points out that the FBI has never substantiated any ritual killings over a biased publication like this one.

Interesting how the hearsay from the locals is viewed as credible while statements in support of the WM3 are all suspect. This book neither proves nor disproves their guilt.

Very good book, thorough and informative. I didn't expect to learn anything new having already read the trial transcripts , I hope these three burn in hell

Amazon completely censored my original review, despite it falling perfectly within the review guidelines. So again, please ignore the 1 star reviews, they are wrong. Buy this based on the 4 and 5 star reviews. It appears even amazon are in on the agenda for truth.

This book presents the facts. And all the facts point to one conclusion. What I find most interesting, is the fact all these Hollywood 'stars' pushed for the release of these men.

Up to chapter 11, getting frustrated with the author. I have no problem that he thinks the WM3 are guilty, maybe they are, but misdemeanours as kids do not necessarily make you a triple killer.The chapter on Jason Baldwin portraying him as a criminal and sociopath is laughable. Author is clutching at straws here. Many kids smash windows and get into skirmishes with siblings, this does not mean they go on to torture and murder children.Granted Echols sounds bloody weird and, if the dog story is to be believed, a real cause for concern. However, if being interested in stuff like witches and vampires, wearing all black, filing nails to a point and listening to punk & heavy metal (as was the fashion at the time) makes you a satanist child murderer then I must have been one in the 80s...without knowing it.BTW Echols could not drive so the creepy kiddie watching prowler driving off in the green car was unlikely to have been him, a fact the author fails to mention.I will continue reading & update my review. I am hopeful that Meece will be able to convince me of their guilt with facts rather than his prejudices and hearsay.

When I'm reading a non-fiction, I want all the facts. I couldn't give a monkeys chuff about the personal opinion of the author, I want to be able to make up my own mind, yet the entire book is completely biased, with the author being hell-bent on proving guilt, despite numerous inaccuracies about the case.Wish I could get my money back if I'm honest.

I feel like this is poorly written. Some spelling and grammar mistakes