The Merovingian Mythos and the Mystery of Rennes-le-Chateau

When I started reading this book i felt that many paets were lifted almoost directly from HOLY BLOOD, HOLY RAIL, but I kept reading to give him the benifit of my doubts about his research until I reached the part where he said that "Edward the 4th had only partially followed Philip Le Bel's orders to rid England of the Tem[lars. Well it wasn't Edward the 4th it was Edward the 2nd/Edward the 3rd started the 100 Year was and had a son Edward the Black Prince who died before heis father and never inherited the crown. This started the "War of the Roses" as there were no further direct inheritors of the Yorkist line.Well,, I continued reading the book as I thought, just maybe, it was a typographical error using the 4th for the 2nd Edward. But when I came to the part where he attributes Catherine de Medici as being the mother of Mary Queen of Scots, I finally stopped reading it. Mary Queen of Scots was the daughter of Marie de Guise and James the 5th of Scotland. Catherine de Medici was briefly her mother-in-law!This book is just rubbish!

Why forget Plantard's and Sauniere's frauds? It's a gigantic scheme, but is it true? How can you be with and against the catholics, and with against the jews? Who became the Grand Priest after Plantard? Or Cocteau, for that matter? I don't believe in this s***, though it sounds ok.

The historical inaccuracies say everything I'm afraid.If you want historical facts, this isn't the book