Lowly Origin: Where, When, and Why Our Ancestors First Stood Up

A must read if you are interested in human evolution . The author has a fresh perspective and is an entertaining writer. I only gave it 3 stars because of the use of species 'nicknames' came across to me as sloppy and distracting in an otherwise very interesting point of view. Maybe we should blame the editor for allowing this. The last chapter too was well written and thought out but seemed to belong in a different book, it drew me away from the main theme.

Kingdom has approached the evolution of bipedalism with a global perspective that includes all possible conditions that favored the change of 4 footed movement to a vertical 2 footed base. His theories of where when why and how the anatomical changes are the first fearlessly intelligent and rigorously researched exploration I have found. It faces the interdisciplinary questions rather than the usual simplification to a researchers speciality. I am delighted with the freshness of Kingdom's ideas.

I recommend this book to anyone wanting to better understand our ancestors, not as unearthed fossils, but as living creatures who roamed the earth. Kingdon uses his own illustrations to bring us face-to-face with these ancient creatures, and to show just how we arrived on the scene. I am a scientist, but not an anthropologist, and have to admit that I needed to read the book twice to really understand it. Kingdon does not hand the reader easy answers, and does not provide summaries -- but rather proposes scenarios and dynamics that played out over several million years. This book is a delight, but it requires patience and/or some rereading.

An ecological study of human origins. One of it's kind.

Kingdon's English is bizarre, as he mixes colloquial and technical terminology badly. It is also frequently defective, with missing verbs and incorrect spellings (e.g., 'illusive' for 'elusive', page 228). The typeface is horrible; why it was chosen is beyond me.

The next time you're tending your garden, pause a moment. Consider your position and local environment. Squatting down or on your knees, reaching around to weed or till, you are likely repeating a similar pose held by your ancient ancestors. According to Jonathan Kingdon, our African forebears started along their evolutionary path rooting about on the woodland floor seeking dinner. When conditions changed, they stood up to seek better places. The result was a questing ape that ultimately filled nearly every useful site on our planet. It will take serious research, an analytical mind and top-notch writing skills to surpass or supplant this superb study. Some artistic skills wouldn't go amiss, either.Kingdon has produced the finest work on human evolution since Darwin's Descent of Man. His focus is our upright stance, but he examines far more than simply physiology in explaining how we expanded around the globe. The story of human evolution was upended by Raymond Dart in 1924. Before then, as Kingdon relates, it was believed pre-humans grew large, useful brains before descending from the trees. Dart's Taung Child demonstrated upright walking developed long before our mighty minds. Why this was so is a question that has plagued anthropologists for decades. Kingdon lists thirteen theories for why we stood upright - then demolishes them thoroughly. He also peels away the idea that there's a clearly traceable lineage of successive steps from early hominins to modern humans. For one thing, he reminds us, fossil location doesn't necessarily reflect points of origin.The key word in Kingdon's title is not "how", but "why". Each species is adapted to its current environmental condition. Walking implies relocation and he posits that an East African "ground ape" likely followed rivers to their origins and beyond in the quest for resources. At some point, pre-human species became "niche thieves" - occupying or invading empty or inhabited resource areas. Vagaries of climate, the onset of disease or direct competition led to further changes in our physiology. We got better at walking, but we also learned new habits or improved on old ones. Twigs used to probe for food led to sticks for defence or attack, ending in spears for hunting. Spear casting is practiced from an early age in hunter-gatherer societies - young boys develop hunting skills through play activities. The retention of child-like traits is called "neoteny". Although this term is usually applied to body forms, especially facial features, it may also refer to behaviour. To Kingdon, childhood skills encouraged brain development to make us better hunters. Unfortunately, while granting us more complex reasoning ability, brain enlargement and ingenuity granted us access to a widening zone of niches without giving us insight into the impact of that exploitation. It has also led to humans setting themselves apart from the remainder of the animal kingdom. That fallacy, he urges, must be corrected, and soon if our species is to survive. We must not play with the planet any longer.Kingdon's thorough analysis of who we are and how we arrived at today's condition is unquestionably the best available. A fine writer, his African origins are reflected in many vignette descriptions of environments and their inhabitants. In addition to his prose talents is a capacity for vivid illustration. He presents many evolutionary scenarios that include self-portraits as an element in comparative studies. This book will endure and should be required reading in any course in anthropology or sociology, let alone ecology. [stephen a. haines - Ottawa, Canada]

For one who is into human evolution, you will love it.

everything ok

Excellent