Ryzen™ 7 5700G 8-Core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor with Radeon™ Graphics

– INITIAL EXPERIENCE AND iGPU IMPRESSION This is actually an OUTSTANDING Cpu. I bought it for building a test-bench with "OpenBenchTable" (you can look it up on youtube, they're pretty sweet), and I figured it might be a good idea to have integrated graphics built-in. Boy, was I right. A video card that worked perfectly well with my other system (which I'm still using) for some reason would not participate in video output, even though its fans were spinning. As a matter of fact, if it weren't for this iGPU, I probably wouldn't have even been able to build my system. Once I got everything running and setup however, for some reason the video card I was just talking about suddenly started working (and it's not a matter of drivers because we're including the BIOS display here too). However - what I came to realize, to my great dismay and simultaneous delight, was that the built-in AMD Radeon graphics on this chip actually look BETTER than the mid-tier GTX 10-series that eventually started working. There was a washed-out and overly exposed character to the Nvidia graphics, while the Radeon built-ins came right out of the box looking rich, properly contrasted and - for lack of a better term - THICC... (plus, AMD's display management software beats Nvidia's any day, and this comes from a daily Nvidia driver) – IGPU PERFORMANCE (emulation gaming) Ok, so I didn’t build this test-bench for AAA gaming purposes. But I do like me some emulation, and I figured the G in “5700G” must have stood for “O.G.” So I threw on a PS2 emulator (PCSX2) and here are my very un-scientific results. Gran Turismo 3 was a little too stuttery at 2K (4x original resolution), though less than I thought; 4K was a no-go, though the system tried (6x original); and 1080p was ABSOLUTELY playable (3x original), and I plan to do it again sometime with a friend. You’d probably get the best outcome from 720, but I’m a little snobbish about my emulation standards. The entire CPU package itself got to 52° also, for what that’s worth, and the graphics processing ramped-up to 2000mHz. All-in-all, not bad for what you get especially considering how much emulators rely on V-ram (which there isn’t much of here). – CPU IMPRESSION As for the CPU itself, I'm equally impressed. I was ABOUT to click "buy" on the 5950X, since it seems to be the top of the line that AM4 will support as I went with a B550 motherboard instead of B650 for compatibility purposes (afterall, "testbench" remember?). I figured “well, it’s open-air, maybe I can get away with non-liquid cooling despite the 5950x’s product recommendation;” but then I realized I wouldn’t have had a grahpics backup, and as I mentioned, this would have been a disaster for not only my system setup, but also my wallet! So now not only am I saving on money and space, but I’m also saving on power as well. Win, win, win. – CPU/TEMP PERFORMANCE (non-gaming) Performance-wise, so far I've experienced no lagginess or lack of processing throughput thus far. It sticks around 4,000 mhz at any given time for basic tasks (3.7ghz to 4.5d), and alternates between low 30’s to low 40’s celsius. During non-overclocked performance testing (with Gigabyte autotune turned on) using Prime95, it hovered around 59-60° during a three minute “blend” test - but surprisingly, with “small FFT torture” it actually stuck around 55° instead. Only with CPU-Z multi-core stress testing did it get anywhere near 70° (and remember, this is with an open benchtable setup), so I’m really not worried about the temps – though I have no doubt their lower baseline due to this setup is probably contributing to its performance somewhat. Ambient temp of ~78° throughout. NOTE: This is with a bequiet! Pure Rock 2 FX, which looks really “benchin’” on my rig as well (see photo), and I’m sure is helping with those temperatures more than the included wraith cooler (which is still nice to have on hand as a backup). I also used Noctua NT-H1 grease this time, which seems to perform 1° better against Arctic’s MX-4 based on previous tests I did with my other system. – OPERATING SYSTEMS I forgot to mention, the operating systems I've deployed thus-far on this system have been: Windows 10 Fedora Linux and “Haiku” OS (yes, actually that) ALL of these have been completely functional right out-of-the-box, without the need for installing additional drivers. I only added the drivers for Windows 10 because I wanted the RADEON graphics management software, and also just to see what it would do. You could honestly live without them if you wanted because the hardware is simply so universally compatible. Giant plus there, especially for a workbench station. GIANT plus on AMD's part for making dedicated software for multiple Linux distributions as well. – TAKEAWAY After this experience, I’m seriously considering looking into Radeon for any graphical expansions I might want to do with this board. I didn’t expect its initial output to be so utterly solid. My only concern would be size in that case, since this is a Micro-ATX that I’m working with and it seems a long GPU would actually cover the SATA ports. But I need to stop overdoing it with my drives so much anyway XD – BOTTOM-LINE If you’re looking for something rock-solid for that lingering AM4 seat that can be relied upon under any conditions and you don’t want to spend a fortune, you CAN’T go wrong with this chip. Well worth the price, and well performing for the price range.

New and no issues. The only thing is it said "processor only" so I figured that the picture was generic and I'd get it in OEM packaging. It came with a wraith (stealth I assume, I didn't look) which I added to the pile, they're not bad coolers but I've got a wraith RGB I like so I reused it and have 3 of the stealth now in boxes. Regardless it installed fine and works great. I must have done something wrong in bios when I installed it because I had to re-enroll mok keys for my zfs kernel module in Debian 13, but that's not a big deal. It's working good on an ASRock b450m a/c rev.2.0 and xmp settings on my old ram, waiting on some faster and larger sticks to install. I'm not really a gamer so I couldn't really notice a different in this vs the 2400g but the core utilization is not maxed out anymore for my needs and in fact I have a lot more to work with now. I don't have a GPU or I would have much preferred the 5700x, and I gotta say I do have a little buyers remorse, but I wanted to be able to pass through a GPU to a VM sometimes too so I went back and forth for a while. I'll probably buy more outdated stuff in another 5 or 10 years if I really need it but I don't really see that happening for my use case.

Huge upgrade from my old Athlon 3000G. Installation was straightforward once I updated my BIOS. The performance difference is immediately noticeable and everything feels snappier, games run way better, and I can actually multitask without my system choking. Temps are good with a decent cooler. Well worth the money if you need integrated graphics and solid CPU performance.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is a specialized powerhouse that occupies a unique niche in the AM4 ecosystem. Unlike the "X" variants, this is a monolithic "Cezanne" die rather than a chiplet design, which brings both distinct technical advantages and specific trade-offs for the enthusiast builder. Integrated Graphics & 1080p Performance The headline feature is the Radeon Vega 8 graphics. In technical testing, it remains one of the most capable iGPUs ever released for the desktop. For users without a discrete GPU, it comfortably handles popular eSports titles like Valorant, CS:GO, and Dota 2 at 1080p with consistent frame rates. Even more demanding titles like Fortnite or GTA V are playable at 1080p on low-to-medium settings. Architecture & Memory Latency While it shares the Zen 3 name with the 5800X, there are two critical technical differences: L3 Cache: The 5700G has 16MB of L3 cache, which is half of what you find on the 5700X/5800X. This can lead to slightly lower 1% low frame rates when paired with a high-end discrete GPU. Monolithic Die: Because it isn't a chiplet design, the memory latency is actually superior to the Vermeer chips. This makes the 5700G highly responsive to high-speed DDR4; while it officially supports 3200MHz, it often excels with 3600MHz or 4000MHz kits, which significantly boosts the iGPU's bandwidth. Thermal & Power Efficiency TDP & Cooling: At a 65W default TDP, it is remarkably efficient. The bundled Wraith Stealth cooler is sufficient for stock operation, but if you plan to utilize the unlocked multiplier for overclocking, I recommend a mid-range air tower. Thermal Ceiling: The 95°C Tjmax provides a safe buffer for PBO (Precision Boost Overdrive) tuning. In my builds, it typically idles around 35°C and stays under 70°C during heavy gaming on air cooling. Technical Limitations to Note The most significant "hidden" trade-off is the PCIe 3.0 limitation. Unlike the 5700X, this processor does not support PCIe 4.0. If you are using a high-end Gen4 NVMe SSD or a GPU that relies on x8 Gen4 lanes (like the RX 6600), you will be capped at Gen3 speeds. The Verdict: This is the ultimate "safety net" CPU. It’s perfect for small form factor (SFF) builds, home office workstations, or gamers waiting for GPU prices to drop. It provides 8-core/16-thread multi-threaded muscle that rivals the 3700X while offering a built-in GPU that can actually game.

I needed this for the Integrated graphics feature, it works great. Its suppose to have two less cores than my previous CPU. But I cant tell the difference. Everything still runs smooth.

This processor is a workhorse! I have it running in a desktop server running QEMU/KVM for virtualization since 2023. I paired this with 32 gigs of ram, I can easily run 12 vms providing various services including media streaming, voice chat, and gaming. I run a small k8s cluster on the same box for testing and the performance is outstanding for my lab and home network use. Love having 16 threads!

It's a good CPU that is quite affordable at the moment. I bought a PC with this in it a couple years ago. I fortunately, the Mobo didn't have the onboard video ports to utilize the IGPU. PC did come with a RTX 3060. Good card. Though problem with the 5000 series Ryzen is their G series (apu) only comes with PCIe 3.0. For what it is, it runs cooler and a little less power than the next step up. I replaced it with a Ryzen 9 5950x (max that the system Mobo can use). While I love this processor....it definitely a furnace compared to the 5700g. My 5700g sat for half a year. Then I donated it along with some random spare parts I had to a friend of mine who wanted to upgrade from his i5-4590. The board he got have video ports. And the IGPU on it is way better than the old gtx 720 he's been using for years. I had to convince him to not put that graphics card back in. He never regretted it. He used the system as is till December when he was able to get his own RTX 3060 on sale. Anyways, I ended up buying another one recently when I decided to retire my old AMD A10 HTPC system I use for my semi truck. And decided to get this again. I originally wanted a i3 13100. But the itx Mobos were higher than the AM4 Mobo. And even harder to find LGA 1700 itx with DDR4 recently. So I went with AM4, and this time, going to use IGPU only. Itx case is tiny, and I needed to upgrade the PSU to be able to power it, let alone have the plugs to plug it on the board. So far, the 5700g have been an overkill for an HTPC itx system. And with the right low profile cooler, it runs way cooler than the old A10 system I had in it. Pros - Good Jack of all trades processor for small builds. Runs cool for what it's got to offer for multitasking. Cons - If you plan to use a graphics card, or need something faster than PCIe 3.0. Then get a Ryzen 5000 series without the igpu. Ryzen 7 5700x or lower will still be a great drop in for an itx build, if needing PCIe 4.0. especially for wanting to use a graphics card. Though at this point, an i5 or lower will be a better setup for an itx build.....if the prices for the Mobos would match AM4 offerings. Granted, similar problem for AM5s itx.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is a high-performance processor that offers impressive specifications and capabilities. In this extensive review, we will delve into the processor's architecture, performance, integrated graphics, power efficiency, and overall value for users seeking a powerful CPU for their computing needs. Architecture: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is based on the Zen 3 architecture, featuring a 7nm manufacturing process and a chiplet design that enables efficient performance and power management. The processor incorporates an 8-core, 16-thread configuration, with a base clock speed of 3.8 GHz and a boost clock speed of up to 4.6 GHz, delivering exceptional multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. Performance: With its multi-core prowess and high clock speeds, the Ryzen 7 5700G excels in demanding workloads, such as content creation, video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The processor's Zen 3 architecture enhances instructions per clock (IPC) performance, resulting in snappy and efficient operation across a wide range of applications. Integrated Graphics: One of the standout features of the Ryzen 7 5700G is its integrated Radeon graphics based on the Vega architecture. The processor includes 8 compute units (CUs) running at up to 2.0 GHz, providing capable integrated graphics performance for casual gaming, multimedia tasks, and light content creation without the need for a dedicated graphics card. Power Efficiency: The Ryzen 7 5700G showcases remarkable power efficiency, thanks to its 7nm process and refined architecture. The processor's power management allows for efficient utilization of resources, contributing to lower power consumption and heat output, making it an excellent choice for small form factor builds and energy-conscious users. Overall Value: From a value perspective, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G offers a compelling proposition for users who prioritize both strong CPU and integrated GPU performance. Its versatility makes it an ideal choice for budget-friendly gaming rigs, home theater PCs, and productivity-focused systems where space and power constraints are factors to consider. In conclusion, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G impresses with its Zen 3 architecture, robust multi-threaded performance, capable integrated Radeon graphics, power efficiency, and overall value for users looking for a well-rounded processor with integrated graphics capabilities. If you have any further questions or need additional details about the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, feel free to ask!