2(X)ISTMen's Cotton Stretch No Show Trunk 3-Pack, White/White/White, Large

been buying these for years, worth the money, had other brands fall appart before these

I mostly wear a medium size. These trunks feel like a small size. Perhaps because they have 8% spandex. I already washed them so I can't return them. I wasted my money.

Excellent quality heavy undies in cotton stretch....Evolve is a lighter version of 2xist....Sooo.... 2xist seems to cut their undies to make males look more endowed....just FYI

This material are soft and fit well under shorts or slacks. But if you tend to dribble after you tingle these shorts will not adsorb like 100% cotton will.

Well made and stylish. I am a traditionalist, so I like they are in white. The pouch is a little too snug, so they are not my first choice for a day of travel or lounging. Much better for a day of activity.

Moving on into my mid-40s, I need something with lift but doesn't make me look shamefully old when my pants are down. I don't always want a brief and boxers can sometimes climb up, especially me with muscled thighs. They hold everything together, but also don't compress to a point where you're flat-fronted and tucked as if you're ready to perform on RuPaul's Drag Race. They also don't ride up and give you a wedge salad no one wants to toss.

For the cost of this I was expecting a better quality product. I'd say this is better than Fruit of the Loom or Haynes, but barely. It is not bad at all, but there are much less expensive options out there. A good brand with better quality for less is Evolve.

The styling of 2(X) IST stretch no-show men's underwear is all over the place. The name is the same, but one package has an inseam (across the crotch from one leg hem to the other) of 10 inches (red in top of photo) another is 7inches (the middle grey pair)... The ones in THIS package are only 4 inches ( black at bottom of hoot). They are going back! The grey ones with 7in inseam were also from Amazon- the 3-pack that had a pair of "poppy red" in them (but those red ones are now in the wash). I can't promise that would be the case if you bought that pack and from that other vendor, because I believe this a 2(X)IST issue.The first time I bought this brand and this "style" description was at Marshalls. Same problem: one pack was 10in, the other was 3in. I'm returning anything under 7. In our case, it's not just about feel or look. Anything under 7in really cannot support a 'Depends' pad and keep it centered.They ought to make it possible to know what your really buying. Some places won't take underwear back.And by the way, I couldn't figure what the words "no show" mean. If they're suggesting that they ride low and the waist won't show over your jeans, I'm here to say that they are NOT low riders. However, they are just right.If they mean that the leg hem is fitted to your leg so no one can see your dunnage by looking up your Bermudas, then yes. Good for that! Even with the short inseam ones. Having said that, the legs are not too tight, either.If no-show means they're not bulky and will not show, OK.The legs couldn't possibly show below those of any men's outer shorts.So really, what do they intend by "no-show"?Back to my original complaint--- make them all the same or give them different names!

Muy buena calidad, ensamble y súper frescos y cómodos.

Suaves y cómodos, si bien son ajustado no se siente que aprieten. Si te gusta que todo está sujeto son perfectos si prefieres holgados está no es la opción. Comodisimos

Son muy comodos, hasta el momento bien.

son muy comodos ajuste perfecto

Cómodo, buena tela, un poco amplios