The Nordic Theory of Everything: In Search of a Better Life

Absolutely brilliant book! Partanen mingles well-researched statistics with personal anecdotes and journalistic storytelling to craft an engaging and convincing argument for the Nordic mindset. Her cautious but persuasive arguments aren't aimed at demeaning the U.S., but rather at showing us that we have room to grow. She acknowledges that the U.S. did much to move the world forward past monarchies and into democratic societies. However, what many of us fail to see is that the U.S. has stagnated and other nations have moved on ahead of us. We think that we're the land of opportunity and freedom, but unfortunately we have less of each of these than we realize. I particularly loved understanding the Nordic mindset behind their policies: their view of love and what enables people and societies to thrive. It's fascinating. Every U.S. citizen should read this book!

Interesting Nordic living theory

“The core idea is that authentic love and friendship are possible only between individuals who are independent and equal.” (p.50) Maybe It’s personal. After all, my parents were immigrants from Sweden, immersed in a Swedish-American culture that constituted the theme of my own growth experience in the twentieth century. Or maybe it’s just that it’s so sensible. Maybe it was my parent’s encouragement of positive goals in life and utter discouragement of humiliating child training techniques. Maybe it was the belief my neighborhood encouraged in taking responsibility for one’s own life even while granting the same right to others. Maybe it was believing in a United States where that was possible for everyone. Maybe it’s what I know as a psychologist that the core idea of authentic love as described in the author’s opening is indeed the way of personal and cultural growth. And maybe it’s what I learned in my mature years that the freedoms I accepted were not so equally available to everyone. Maybe it’s the dream I still hold for a United States where one day the ideal will be reality. Whatever the reason, that opening theme clutched my heart with longing and joyful sadness. Maybe it’s that I believe loving someone or something is open to accepting their imperfections and believing the good can be strengthened even as the bad is corrected. Maybe it’s that genuine love of my country includes the belief that, like an effective parent, I can help correct it for the good. O r maybe it’s just that I have often thought how freeing it would be not to worry about being available to love and care for one’s child while at the same time being able to pay for sufficient food and housing, or the best possible education for encouraging individual growth and responsibility from toddlerhood through adulthood, or paying for the maintenance of good health, or not losing one’s home because of a catastrophic accident or illness, or being sure of a good healthy life in old age. How it would make sense to me to pay sixty percent of my income in taxes if all needs were covered so forty percent would be available to me to develop my own creative – or just plain comfort – goals. How very practical. How free of unnecessary stress. How very much what the Nordic way has to offer, based on the idea that “authentic love and friendship are possible only between individuals who are independent and equal.” (p.50) As for the author’s personal message and style, it is so clear that she has a fondness both for her native Finland and for her adopted United States. And I love the way chapter by chapter she takes down the objections to the Nordic way. I like the final conclusion: “Individualism is one of the great foundations of Western culture. But unless society secures personal independence and basic security for the individual, it can lead to disaffection, anxiety, and chaos … While some of the praise heaped on the Nordic nations in the international media and various studies has surely been exaggerated and overpositive—no place is flawless, as Nordic people themselves will be the first to point out—the Nordic countries have undeniably created a model for what a high quality of life and a healthy society can look like in the twenty-first century.” (pp.328-329)

This extraordinarily interesting book just published was brought to my attention by a Finnish friend who has lived and worked in the United States for many years, becoming a U.S. citizen in the process. As a retired American Foreign Service Officer for 35 years who in the 1970s and 1980s served twice in the U.S. Embassy in Finland and dealt with Nordic issues in the Department of State in Washington, I had come to admire greatly the Nordic social/political/economic model that to a greater or lesser degree has been followed for several decades by all five of the Nordic countries: Sweden, Finland, Norway Denmark and Iceland. This model has been studied and characterized by social scientists, economists, historians and other academics from many different perspectives and points of view. However, I think the author of this book has performed a unique and extraordinary service by being able to convey the essence and "feel" of what is going on in Nordic societies that those of us who were fortunate to have lived there for some years came to recognize and admire but which is so hard to articulate to an often self-satisfied and self-absorbed American public skeptical of and ill-informed about how foreign countries govern themselves. Perhaps her most important contribution has been to dare to question why most Americans consider that social investment in education, health care and measures to assure decent income opportunities, adequate vacation and leave time and the general "well-being" for all of its citizens should be condemned as "socialism" and as a threat to individual freedom, self-determination and as a disincentive to individual initiative. Indeed she goes on to argue that those very programs encouraging the well-being of all Nordic citizens in fact enhance the freedom of citizens to pursue their individual talents and dreams free from the burden of unequal education, health care and opportunity. This position stands on its head the traditional American sense of freedom drawn from our pioneer days of rugged frontier individualism. Obviously, these concepts deserve and receive in the book far more scrutiny, and the book can appear at times quite strident in its criticisms mostly on the U.S. side of the equation. It is notable, however, how the Nordic countries as a group (and often Finland in particular) rank at or near the top of the entire developed world in so many important disciplines in contrast to a lagging United States. It is a fascinating book which should lead us to compare where we in the United States are as a nation compared to the Nordic countries, which seems to serve as a model toward which other nations appear be trending. By the way I am the author of a book "On the Finland Watch: an American Diplomat in Finland During the Cold War," published in English in 2000 and 2001. The book analyzes the triangular U.S. relations with Finland and the Soviet Union during the Cold War period.

I was always under the impression that things were better in the Nordic countries in terms of health care, child care, parental leave, education, and so on, but it was utterly shocking to read this book and learn how much better off it is there, and how backwards it is here in America. The author builds her case with both statistics and anecdotes that put a human face on the statistics. She also corrects the assumption that taxes are higher there, in fact tax rates are about the same but there are policies in place to make things like the cost of health care much lower than it is here (the state negotiates for lower drug prices, there's less administrative overhead, lower doctor salaries, and so on). The quality of Nordic public education is already well known and could be emulated here, without the American mania for vouchers, scam for profit charter schools and the like that are based on ideology and nothing more. The key seems to be having better training and pay for teachers. As America barrels recklessly toward drastic cuts to social programs like health care, public school education, the social safety net, and worker benefits, this book is well worth reading to see how there is another, better way. I would love to see this book reach a wide audience. It would make a great movie along the lines of "An Inconvenient Truth". Truly a must read book for America right now.

Nicely written account of a deeply transformative personal journey. I am American and lived for 14 years in Sweden (I'm back in the US again, so I completed the circle), and I recognize many of the author's personal observations. There is a gulf between America and the Nordic countries in terms of social contracts, solidarity, and rational policy. But the author is naive: she thinks she has come to a different yet free village, but has in fact moved from a village to a plantation. Until Americans realize and fight this, there will always be such a gulf.

I learned a great deal about life in Finland from this book. I agree with reviewers who say they would love for our politicians here in the US to read it. Our country is terribly flawed, broken, corrupt, and life here is hard although we are constantly told it is the greatest nation on Earth thanks to our “freedom”, which is not real. With that said, simply based on the number of illegal immigrants in this nation, how could we emulate this government structure? There must be people there who do not contribute. What percentage of the population in Finland comprises those who do not contribute? How does that population receive benefits if they’re undocumented? The author offers a lot of opinions and, I felt, was quite critical of the United States, but what I would like to know is specifically where we stand currently financially with what it costs us as a nation to care for illegal immigrants educationally or medically, for example. Perhaps adopting this structure and eradicating our high insurance or education costs personally would mean we could all chip in for our taxes and take care of everyone medically, in retirement, etc. and not be in such terrible debt? In satisfying the curiosity that was sparked from reading this, I Googled Finland’s immigration policies. It turns out that this is a growing issue there too and apparently some years ago an offer was made to help illegal immigrants make their way back home if they left voluntarily. That was followed by a comment that here in the US there is a pro-illegal immigrant sector of our population which thinks that is unacceptable. Problem number one is that the people of the US can agree on very little. How could we agree on such a fundamental change to everything we know, even if it is corrupt? Back to immigration, Finland has apparently welcomed some refugees, but from the articles I discovered they are already realizing that not all cultures integrate well. One article I found on BBC.com indicates there is much anti-refugee sentiment and the mostly Lutheran country is highly polarized on the topic. With all the pro-free education the author raves about, how are they educating children who do not speak the languages in the Finnish utopia? Is anyone angry their children’s learning is slowed as they sit in classes with children who need more attention because they don’t speak the languages or is it all about the love? I am curious how this will play out over time and whether there will still be an overarching feeling of love for all people when the dreaded resentment Anu discusses arises for those who do not wish to assimilate or contribute. I am curious how this is being handled, and how it will be handled as the immigrant populations, in some cases with such different customs, expectations, and beliefs, grow in the Nordic countries. Quick side note, the author mentions that the US government is able to manage some things well and mentions social security as a success. The book seems well researched, although I always keep in mind data can be interpreted differently, but last I heard Social security is a disaster. So I take all of this with great interest, but wanting more facts. With all this said I must admit this conservative reader who eschews big government is intrigued by how the Nordic countries live and by the concept of love and desire for the good of all. Could smarter government here in the US enhance quality of life for everyone? We have an incredibly long way to go to get there, but this book opened my eyes to what could be.

What if you had a government that took care of every citizen from before the time they were born? Health care, education, etc? It turns out that this can be a good strategy for creating individuals who are well-educated, content, and productive. In the United States we don't have very many safety nets compared to the Nordic countries. By the time any significant help kicks in, a citizen may be in such a horrible state that there is almost no return, or if there is return it is going to be very expensive and a huge challenge on all sides. A nearly vertical uphill struggle. Partanen has lived in both Scandinavia and the United States. She first explains--based on first-hand knowledge--that the levels of anxiety and depression experienced in the United States are not as typical in Finland. Then she explains why: the Finish government doesn't invest in helping poor people; the government invests in all its citizens, so that they don't become disadvantaged. Of course, such an approach assumes that one can stomach a society where everyone does well. Perhaps that is at odds with the American dream? It might be missing a small group that is so wealthy that it has its own unique set of mental and physical and emotional problems. But I think I could handle the absence of such a group. Partanen notes that Finland didn't come to this solution automatically. They restructured their society systematically after studying other countries around the world to identify methods that seemed to work. When it then turned out they were testing highest in the world in education, and were gaining praise from other countries, at first they didn't believe it; that was not their self image. Change is possible. Positive change is possible. Read this book. Imagine. Vote.

L'auteure, journaliste finlandaise émigré aux US, dresse une comparaison entre les systèmes américain et nordique en matière d'éducation, santé, vie pro, etc. Elle s'attarde peut être un peu trop sur l'éducation et prend surtout le cas de la Finlande. Ce dernier n'étant pas un pays scandinave, les différences sont parfois estompées volontairement. Se lit facilement et prête à sourire régulièrement.

Really well researched and well written, eye opening. I'm European and although I had some understanding of the american social system, after reading this book I fully appreciated the lunacy of some of the policies and systems over there, and got an even better understanding of the way the Nordic countries consider their children and their people and how the whole system is set to be fair to all. Really enjoyable due to the examples and nice narrating style.

Firstly 5 stars for quick delivery. Back in 2020, 3 months delivery time was estimated. Got my hands on it in Feb and a day's delivery was wonderful. About the book, eye opener for a simple yet progressive approach to education, lifestyle, eating habits and health. Gives us an idea of what we can tweak in our life to work towards a stressfree life. Does emphasize on State's contribution a lot. But people bring the change. Although too much comparison with US isn't fair. US still is miles better than rest of the world if not versus the Nordic countries. Must read .

Absolutely EXCELLENT! The same important lessons for the U.S. also apply to Canada - with certain exceptions, above all medical care. The system of medical care in Canada is FAR better than in the U.S., for reasons that are common knowledge. In Canada, the system for education and the funding for it is also much better than in the U.S., at all levels, and as a result the costs of getting a good education in Canada are far less of a concern than they are in the U.S. . I note also that the book has very good reviews from Americans - in spite of the U.S. not being shown in a favourable light in some respects, notably medical care and the costs of education. Canadians should also pay careful attention to this very important book - because of the lessons it has for them too. In my view the book in also very "well balanced" because its Finnish author Anu Partanen goes to great trouble to describe the good points and the bad points about life in both the U.S. and her native country which is Finland. It is also very well documented, as evidenced by the long list of references cited.

The author totally nails a sweet spot between relevance and detail explaining the public policies that make a modern society great. I had read two of the books she mentions and found that she conveys their key ideas better than the originals! Very highly recommended!