♻️ Keep your Dyson breathing fresh — because clean air is the new luxury!
Erinice’s 2-pack CY22 pre-motor filter replacements are precision-engineered for Dyson Big Ball vacuum models CY22 to CY28 and DC75 to DC78. Made from high-density ABS and polyester, these washable, reusable filters trap 99.97% of microscopic particles, enhancing suction and air quality. Each set includes two filters and a cleaning brush, offering up to six months of maintenance-free cleaning with easy, tool-free installation.
| Brand Name | Erinice |
| Model Info | CY18 CY22 CY23 CY24 CY25 |
| Item Weight | 2.89 ounces |
| Product Dimensions | 2 x 2 x 4 inches |
| Item model number | CY18 CY22 CY23 CY24 CY25 |
| Part Number | 967371-01 |
| Compatible Device | Dyson Big Ball vacuum cleaner (CY22, CY23, CY24, CY25, CY26, CY27, CY28, DC75, DC77, DC78) |
| Material Type | Polyester, Plastic |
| Included Components | 2pcs * Pre-Filters, 1pc * cleaning brush |
| Batteries Included? | No |
| Batteries Required? | No |
E**N
As expected
Fits and works grest
L**E
Perfect fit
Speedy delivery and perfect fit in my Dyson ball canister vacuum
E**O
It is a good option to replace the original filter on your vacuum
I will start with a few of the pros:Pros:They do seem to be a good fit to replace the original filter from your vacuum.Good Value for money and it is a pair of filters.These specific type of filters can be washed, so they can be reused a number of times.These come with the extra tool, that could be helpful. Not really sure the intended use but it has a little brush at the bottom and some sort of cutting edge under the hook. So it might be of use.Cons:At least my package came with one of the filters compressed, perhaps the way that it got packaged but one of the filters was a bit deformed, this didn't seem to be an issue as it was able to fit nicely.The materials used are clearly different and maybe a bit inferior in terms of look and feel. They are close to the original, but the original filter seems to be constructed better with better materials. So quality is lacking a bit here.Also tied to the materials, the interior section of this filter seems to be constructed with a less dense, more porous type of mesh. So again, the original filter takes the win but this may be a close second and again cheap option to replace with a new filter.I can't place an opinion in terms of durability and filtering capacity as it is too early for that but I will do my best to update.
Trustpilot
1 day ago
1 week ago
