TP-Link Omada SG2005P-PD | 5 Port Outdoor PoE Passthrough Gigabit Ethernet Switch | 1 PoE++ in@90W, 4 PoE+ Out Up to 64W | IP55, Static Routing, Access Control List, QoS, VLAN | PoE Powered ONLY

Needed a switch for my patio that could handle being exposed to the elements and didn’t need an electric socket near by. This fits the bill perfectly and since I’m already heavily invested in the Omada ecosystem, it fits in perfectly. My only wish is that they would just bump the price up a bit and chuck a POE++ injector in the box. I had to buy one separately since my switch doesn’t support POE++ and all my spare injectors are POE+. Anywho, this thing appears to work perfectly. It was painless for my Omada controller to adopt it and update the firmware. This is a very nice little switch. For my uses this will power two POE cameras, a POE access point and will provide a wired data connection to an outdoor smart TV.

This switch has been a game-changer for my network setup. With its handy features and solid build, it helped me effortlessly tackle my connectivity challenges.One standout aspect of this switch is its four PoE+ ports, which provide power to compatible devices like IP cameras and wireless access points. The 65W power supply is more than sufficient, ensuring reliable and consistent performance. Plus, the plug-and-play functionality made the installation a breeze, saving me time and hassle.The sturdy metal construction and shielded ports are worth mentioning, as they enhance durability and protect against electromagnetic interference. The fanless design keeps things quiet, which is a major plus for those seeking a noise-free environment.In terms of performance, this switch excels. The QoS (Quality of Service) feature ensures smooth data flow, preventing bottlenecks and optimizing network efficiency. Additionally, the IGMP Snooping functionality has been invaluable in managing multicast traffic, allowing for seamless streaming and video conferencing.While the switch has a lot going for it, there are a few aspects that could be improved. One limitation is the number of ports. With only five ports available, it may not be suitable for larger network setups requiring more connections. Additionally, some users have reported occasional issues with firmware updates, but I personally haven't encountered any problems.Overall, the TP-Link TL-SG1005P V2 is a reliable and efficient PoE switch that simplifies network management. Its robust design, easy setup, and useful features make it a solid choice for small to medium-sized networks. Just keep in mind the limited number of ports if you have extensive connectivity needs.

I acquired this for my home to replace a Netgear PoE switch that died and stopped delivering power. One of the things I particularly liked was the separate uplink (non-PoE) ports, which left a full 16 ports available for downlink connections. I hooked everything up, turned it on, and everything began working, including some ethernet ports that had previously not been getting power. (The specs say it supports 802.3af/at, make sure your devices are compatible.) The fan in the device makes a little bit of noise, so this is ideally placed in your basement or equipment closet, not your office. It's also quite big, so make sure you have enough room for it (or rack-mount it). No problems observed in the first few days of operation, so I'm a happy customer for now. And as long as it works without trouble at least 3 years, I'll remain a happy customer.Note that there are some operational changes you can make with dip-switches: I left them all off, but advanced users may want to look at a manual before buying, to make sure the options meet the needs.

Works how it should!

Installation was very easy and it works well, including powering my Ubiquiti Access Point via poe. I have one minor caveat about its physical design: presumably in order to minimize the size of the 'package', the power supply socket and a couple of configuration switches are on the opposite side of the device to the ethernet ports. This is not ideal if you want to use it on a desktop, since the connected ethernet cables 'naturally' run back to the far edge of the desk and the more flexible power lead has to be plugged in on the front, visible, side. Also, since all the function LEDS are adjacent to their ports, you can't see them without craning your neck behind the device. It would be preferable, at least from this viewpoint, if all the sockets and switches were on the 'back', and the function LEDs were moved to the front of the 'package'.