The Stokes Field Guide to the Birds of North America (Stokes Field Guides)

December 30, 2011: I still have 17 bird guides from Sibley to Nat'l Geographic, and the only one I've been using for 10 months is this one. Yes, I still have a problem that the Western Region is still given "short shrift" - even in their Western Region book - but compared to the other 16, this is by far the best guide with the best/most photographs, and I've now come to understand much more about birding behavior so I can find birds on my own.HOWEVER, my kids gave me a Kindle Fire for my birthday last week, and I found an APP, iBird Pro 2 on Amazon that is, unbelievably, EVEN BETTER THAN this Stokes and it's portable! This does not take away from the work that went into this remarkable Field Guide. But at 3 pounds, "field guide" is really a misnomer. Stokes is really a reference book, and excellent reference book.March 23, 2011: After using the book for a month, there are a couple of disturbing "findings." It may be my imagination, but I think that the Stokes pay more attention to the Eastern North American birds than those west of the Rockies (note: I didn't say "Mississippi"). Two birds which I recently photographed are not represented correctly in this book. The Oak Titmouse is NOT the Common Titmouse, and there should be two separate pages for the Oak and Juniper Titmice. And - so far - they do not present the Common Grackle or Boat-tailed Grackle as living in the West while I have photographed them in the east counties of the San Francisco Bay Area. Now, I'm beginning to wonder what other species got short shrift.Having seen many of the Stokes' TV shows, they do indeed give more emphasis to Eastern birds. I don't blame them or even fault them. If I lived in New Hampshire, the last thing on my mind would be the Acorn Woodpecker or California Quail. But they DO present these birds, and do that well. (I have 24 bird guides - going back to 1964 - and none mentions the red spot on the yellow bib of the female Acorn Woodpecker. At least Stokes give more attention to the yellow bib.)I have accumulated (not consciously collected) 28 books on birds, at least 14 of them "field guides." Well, the Stokes' Birds of North America is too large to really be a field guide unless you have a Range Rover to cover your fields and a Guide to carry this book, but IT IS in the top 3 guides. Being that thorough, however, you will have a 3 pound book (I just weighed it: 3 pounds on the button).Though I rarely leave the west coast any more, I bought this to get a better idea as to ranges and the differences between Western and Eastern North American birds.The Stokes have given us over 700 birds and from three to eight really good photos of each. The more difficult the species is to distinguish from subspecies, the more photographs. So sparrows, for instance, will rate more photos than a Band-tailed Pigeon. There are quite a few of the birds in flight which is also especially helpful with raptors.Each species has notes as to subspecies and hybrids. Now, I know that male mallards will have sex with anything that floats, but I had no idea that there are 15 hybrids! Even the wood duck could be an offshoot of the promiscuous (and ill-mannered I might add) mallard.Most "birders" like Sibley's guide, and I used that for a while for easy identification. However, there are no photographs, just phenomenal drawings. Then I switched to Smithsonian which has great photographs, and pretty good maps as well as an audio CD (as does Stokes)of bird songs. And then I switched to Stokes' Western Region Guide. To be honest, I find all of these too heavy to carry while walking, and I find all software for phones and iPads that I don't have to be less than satisfactory. Much less. Really bad in fact since even the comparisons are poor.But, since I'm only REALLY interested in birds that are either so striking that I won't forget details or birds that I've just photographed and have to download to my PC anyway, this Stokes' book is the ticket to identify the species and learn as much as I want to learn. I probably will never be able to tell the difference between a chipping sparrow and a savanna sparrow, but that's okay. Only the shipping sparrow lives around here. And there are enough critics of my nature photography web site so that somewhere down the line, somebody will tell me where I've misidentified a bird. I'm thankful for that. I'm also very patient and can wait.I was about to write that I really didn't care about the audio CD, just as I didn't care for Smithsonian's. That's not entirely true, and it brings us back to the sparrow. I CAN distinguish differences in bird songs; I just can tell which thrush or sparrow it came from. Around here, sparrows get together for socializing and maybe even a hand of bridge, and they don't mind singing up a storm regardless of the competition with others. The only one I know for sure is the Song Sparrow. So, every once in a while I will put the CD in and see if I can hear the difference between the Golden-crowned and the White-crowned. Sure, so long as I have the CD. But once out in the field... well, let's just say I've never been good with languages. Besides, almost all sparrows have a very sweet song, though none can compete with the Song Sparrow.Would I recommend this book? In a heartbeat. But I'm guess it weighs well over a pound, so keep it home. The only thing I want now is for the Stokes to come out with the same one in hardbound.Note: With Christmas coming up, I will be giving this to several friends who, though members of the local Audubon Society, will find this one of the best REFERENCE books. In fact, I'll go so far as to say that I'd buy a Kindle if this book was available WITH the songs.

I collect bird books with particular emphasis on field guides and have been doing so since the late 1950s. I have also been birding since even before the "book thing," as my wife calls it. Truth be told, I get almost as much satisfaction over my bird book collecting as I do over the actually birding...not as much mind you, but pretty close! I share this with you because like a couple of other reviewers here, it takes quite a bit to truly impress me at this point in my life. I have to tell you that the "wow factor," for me, is off the charts with this current offering from the Stokes. Now don't get me wrong. I dearly love every one of my field guides, even the old musty ones dating back to the turn of the century which were void of any illustrations and consisted of only rambling post-Victorian text. But for sheer usability this new Stokes ranks right up at the top. But read on.....Now before I go on, the old question of "if you had only one field guide, and only one, which one would you choose - which one is the best?" Oh my! This argument has been going on since as long as I can remember. I have birded with a lot of people from literally all over the world, and when asked that question, I have received dozens upon dozens of answers. Bird field guides are a lot like golf clubs. Everyone has their favorite and folks will go to the matt arguing which is best. When all is said and done though, it all depend upon the individual; what they are use to using, how he perceive birding, what their experience level is, what their dad or mom told them, and on and on and on.From my own experiences and from my own point of view, I would be hard pressed to try to identify a single "best guide." I personally use several of them in the field and even more of them as references. As an example, I grew up using the Peterson guides. I still use them as my primary source. Hey, they are what I am use to. Since those early days though I have added Sibley's guides, and of course Audubon...these are the three guides I carry in the field. I have now added this Stokes to my tote bag; or at least to my stash in my car.The Stokes Filed Guide to the Birds of North America has some of the best photographs of birds I have seen in any guide book. Each bird represented has several shots; perching or standing, flying and of course gender and in most cases, maturity. The photographs are clear and concise and the color is wonderful. Range maps, unlike the Peterson guide, are on the same page as the bird. For "difficult" birds, there are nice little side-bar notes which include identification tips.I personally found the organization of the book, once I use it and got use to it, to be quite workable. The authors have given enough text to allow identification but by necessity have kept the text to a minimum. I personally like this. If I want the life history or life cycle of the book I have plenty of reference books in by library and I have a computer which allows me to do further research once I have identified a given bird. In a field guide I simply do not want a cluttered and detailed text...too much reading in the woods causes a person to miss a lot of birds!Now much as been said and written about the size and weight of this work and rightfully so as a person needs to know what they are getting before they decide to make a purchase, i.e. is it right for me? In my personal case, yes it is right. I do a lot of my birding from fixed positions (I am old and can no longer trek 20 miles a day...bummer) and I also do a lot of "roadside" birding. Yes, I am more stationary now but if you ask me if I would have carried this guide with me when I was younger, my answer would have been yes. Weight did not mean that much to me then as it does now. As it stands, I have been blessed with the ability to take very good field notes. This is not, I can assure you, because I am particularly bright, no - it is because I have been doing it for so long that I was bound to get good at it through sheer repetition. I can use my Peterson and Sibley on difficult birds and record enough data to make a good identification later using my full resources.This book contains a bonus CD of over 600 bird calls our sounds. This is nice and is very useful. In my case it is not as useful as it would be for most folks as I have a tin ear when it comes to music - hey, I have trouble distinguishing between the music of Jimmy Hendrix and a Celtic Flutist...but it is a good CD anyway!This work was a great addition to my library and has been a great help with my birding. What a wonderful resource this book is. This one works for me.Don BlankenshipThe Ozarks

A excelente precio

Extremely good field guide, perhaps a bit hefty for your backpack. Helpful variety of photos for many birds at various stages, thoughtful effort to broaden examples for breeds plus great quality paper, clear identifications etc. No guide can have every possible bird for any location but this is pretty close.

This is an excellent reference book for the North American birds. Each bird has good coloured pictures of it and has a good description of the plumage during various seasons of the year as well as flight, habitat and voice.The book has nearly 800 pages and is fairly heavy so i don't think it would be practical to take on a field trip.It also comes with a cd containing more than 600 bird sounds

One of the best bird books I've ever used. It weighs a bit but it is very hard to find a better book ror species information.,n

Great pictures and easy to follow