Tenergy 1.5V AA Alkaline Battery, High Performance AA Non-Rechargeable Batteries for Clocks, Remotes, Toys & Electronic Devices, Replacement AA Cell Batteries, 120 Pack

Good value for the price. These batteries seem to last as long as name brand batteries.

These batteries are a good deal and they work just as well as any other batteries

Overall a good buy if you're using them in low drain devices.Pros: Unbeatable value for cost per battery.Last well in low drain devicesCons: If you're planning on using these in cell trail cameras you might be disappointed in battery life.(Tested in Cuddelinks, Muddy, Tactacams & wiseeye) I've ran Rayovacs, Procell, Duracell & these since May of this year. Summer time they seemed to perform fairly well, maybe getting a week or two less than the name brands in battery life. However when the temperature started to drop so did the battery life... Substantially. Currently getting 1-2 weeks on the J-Seriess cuddelinks that take 12AAs, Rayovacs and procells are getting around 4. Another thing i noticed in the cuddebacks the batteries are slid into the camera and not in a battery tray, numerous times the batteries seem to slightly swell once they're depleted and makes it a pain to get out. No issues with the other brands & no issues with cameras that have the batteries in a slide out / clip in tray like the Brownings or Muddys.I've only had one leak so far

I have used Tenergy Alkaline, LiPo4 non-rechargeable and rechargeable batteries for several years now, and find them as good as, or better than Duracel, Energizer, and even Amazon basics. I have yet had one leak and ruin my device. In addition, the price is much lower.

These are fine batteries and compare well to any generic brand I've used. I have a couple battery analyzers, so I decided to test these cells at different discharge rates to see exactly how they perform. I compared them against an off-brand called "Exide" that is also a good generic cell that I haven't had any trouble with (and about the same price.)Test A @ 100mah discharge:Tenergy = 2159 mahExide = 2163 mahTest B @ 500mah discharge:Tenergy = 1383 mahExide = 1440 mahI used a cut-off voltage of 0.95v in both tests.As you can see, both brands won't do particularly well in medium to high drain devices, but this is true for alkaline battery chemistry as a whole-- it's a characteristic shared with Duracell, Energizer and all other alkaline brands. In low drain devices they do stellar, matching the capacity of most Ni-mh rechargables. I don't have a new Duracell or other name brand battery to test with, but given these results I can't fathom the name brand batteries giving substantially more capacity, at least not enough to justify the higher cost.So there you have it, real world results suggesting these batteries are at least DECENT. I'm sure for more money you can do better. But I think there's tremendous value in these-- a name brand would have to have 3 times the capacity to make the price per $ math work in their favor, and there's zero chance of that happening. I could potentially see a 10-20% difference, or perhaps a bit better performance in high drain situations, but that simply would not be worth the cost, at least for me.EDIT: The above review is for the AA size of cells. I subsequently tested AAA size, and got an average of 950mah using a 100mah discharge rate. The exide brand tested at 1050. So the Tenergy are not as good as the Exide (which are same price), but still a good value. 950mah capacity rivals that of nimh rechargables (at slower drains) which is good. At high drains Alkaline batteries are not good candidates and capacity will be much less.

I got 700+ box of batteries. Use these along with flashlights to kids along with other items we put in boxes as part of operation Christmas Child every year. It was a great price!

Excellent

This box was torn to shreds and batteries were all over on the inside. I certainly didn't expect to have to count them to make sure they were all there. Ridiculous. I won't buy these again.