Icebreaker: A Novel (James Bond 007 Book 3)
G**N
Better than the last two...
Gardner's Bond, in the two books prior to Icebreaker, had me questioning the Fleming estate for allowing the brand to be mishandled and made into a bad caricature of itself, following the disappointing camp model of Roger Moore's tenure in the role in film. This book redeems Gardner (at least up to this point in his chronology). While he attempts in vain to mimic Fleming's engaging description of the personal habits of Bond and unparalleled presentation of locales that would have been exotic to the average British or American audience, Gardner creates a fast-paced, suspenseful story of intrigue and deception in his third outing. As with the last two books, his representation of Bond's relations with women is laughable at best, but in this effort Gardner gives a more believable relationship between Bond and the leading female, while utilizing his entrenched belief that Bond is a sucker for women to work against him as the book progresses. It's not a great book... but it's a readable adventure for fans of the literary Bond.
R**S
Icebreaker
With his first two novels in the series, Gardner stuck to the standard Bond formula. But with his third novel, Icebreaker, he stayed outside the formula and established all the key elements that would comprise his 007 series: Bond actually involved heavily in intelligence and espionage and a plot with a real-life political or historical background, instead of a big adventure with the fate of the world in the balance and an evil multimillionaire. I don't understand why this bothers so many people. There's dozens of Bond stories following the same routine, formula -the same story with different characters and locations- and Gardner at least tried to do something original and different with the character.In Icebreaker, Bond is assigned to a team also consisting of American, Israeli, and Russian agents. Their mission in the arctic is to monitor a convoy of stolen high-grade military equipment from a Russian army outpost to a WWII-era bunker serving as the headquarters of the National Socialist Action Army, a well-organized neo-Nazi paramilitary group responsible for a number of terrorist attacks and assassinations. Bond quickly learns that the mission has been compromised. The team has been infiltrated by enemy agents. Additionally, the KGB is using the operation as a scheme to capture and deliver Bond to Moscow.The story is extremely fast-paced. The action is tense and well-written. It's fun watching Bond put the pieces together and doubt who he can trust. The locations are an original and fresh change of pace for Bond and really enhances the story's atmosphere and suspense, as there is nothing glamorous or ritzy about Bond struggling to survive in the frozen forests of Finland and Russia.There's a couple minor problems. If the Soviet Union was having problems with their weapons ending up in the hands of a terrorist faction, would they really go to the UK and US for help? And it would seem that a NATO or Russian special ops team would be more suited to carry out a reconnaissance of the enemy base in the middle of the arctic than a team of intelligence agents. But then, this is a Bond story, so I don't expect realism to get in the way of entertainment.Overall, one of Gardner's best Bond novels and just a really great Cold War adventure for 007.
D**L
Bond continuation #3
They’re getting worse! Bond book #1 was solid, book 2 less so, and this one weak and flimsy. The “Icebreaker” initiative takes too long to get going, and the plot unravels in ridiculous fashion. This is like the worst Bond films: Spy who Loved Me, Die Another Day, etc. The cold environment, the interagency intitiative aspect, and the secret base were interesting, but the other aspects were too detrimental.
R**Z
then I gave "For Special Services" an opportunity and I was glad to do so because it was way better tan ...
When I read "License Renewed" I thought 'well, this is disappointing, no more James Bond novels for me', then I gave "For Special Services" an opportunity and I was glad to do so because it was way better tan the first Gardner's Bond novel, now Icebreaker is keeping the good pace from FSS, it was a really fun book with lots of twists every freaking page, the pace is like a mistery movie, every character could be the bad guy (or girl), there were more crosses and double crosses than a Catholic church! I hope the remain of Gardner's Bond books that I haven't read are as fun as this one.
R**N
Bond in the Arctic
Gardner does a good job with Bond do if you've read the Fleming ones till you know them by heart then these will be a great enjoyment for you ... He keeps Bond in the real mold that was the original and he tells a good action adventure story worthy of the originals ...
C**.
I think Gardner is the best post-Fleming Bond writer, but somehow this is the worst post-Fleming novel I've read
I had optimism for this book, because I really enjoyed the first two by Gardner. But this really is the worst of the post-Fleming Bond novels I've read. I would have to agree with some of the other reviews; Bond really comes across as a dumb character here. The number of double-crosses and even triple-crosses in this book is not clever but entirely aggravating. I will probably read more of Gardner's Bond novels because I do think his first two outings are the best post-Fleming Bond novels I've read. Hoping this is just an anomaly.
A**.
A fun book to read.
This book was fun too read.The story was fine and if you are a Bond fan you might enjoy it. I did. Gardner does pick up where Fleming left off. I think a Bond fan will like the book.
N**L
Bloody good!
Excellent. I think John Gardner spun a more exciting 007 tale on many occasions than Fleming himself! Blasphemy? Not in my estimation.
R**6
Mixed views
Some aspects of this story are ok, but too much is just not. Nowhere near the standard of a real Fleming.
D**H
Interesting
First time reading a Bond book not written by Fleming. Huge order to emulate. Good story. Maybe more attention to the minutae of detail we love from Fleming. Will need to read a few more to be convinced
R**Y
Not up to standard
This is without doubt the worst James Bond novel ever written. Do not waste your time buying it - even for 99p on Kindle!
P**S
A typical James Bond story, well told.
The tale that John Gardener tells is a very good follow up to Ian Flemings stories and carries on in the same vein,Hard to put down until you have finished !
M**N
Not the best of the Gardner James Bond books.
But still entertaining enough.Gardner clearly felt at this time that he was ready to make Bond his own. Consequently James Bond is absent for large parts of the book.There are twists and turns as the CIA, KGB and Bond are all after the same thing and the whole plot gets tangled up but neatly untangled at the end.A lovely re-issue by Orion books.
Trustpilot
2 months ago
1 month ago